This argument needs care: it isn't sold as surveillance, it is sold as fairness. Whoever actually works wants it on record.
When the vehicle started and when it finished, without relying on a report.
With PilotOS the driver identifies themselves and the shift is in their name.
Stops and their duration, to see where the day disappears.
Hours per driver, exportable to Excel.
With GuardCheck and PilotOS the shift is logged with a code and a location.
The ranking is there to reward, not only to reprimand.
Exact words you can use on the visit. No jargon.
“This isn't about watching anyone. It is so the people who really work have a way to prove it.”
“When the overtime argument comes, you don't argue: you show.”
“And the driver who always delivers finally has something to base a raise on.”
You resell under your own brand. This is who it works for, and with what argument.
Where work is paid by the day and hours are argued over constantly.
Where it must be proven the guard did the patrol.
Where monthly settlement is a fight.
Where several drivers share one vehicle.
With the trips and stops report, which shows the start time, the end time and how long the vehicle spent at each site. Not the hours reported: the hours recorded.
Yes, with driver identification. Without it the data is per vehicle.
It works as objective backup. The report downloads as a spreadsheet so it can be cross-checked against payroll.
Yes. A person's activity is being recorded, so the company must inform them and put it in writing.
Sold that way, even the drivers back it.