A client who complies out of obligation isn't buying technology: they are buying peace of mind in front of an inspector. Sell that, not software.
With PESV the client builds and maintains the plan they'll be asked for.
With InspectPro there is a record with photo and signature that the vehicle was checked.
With FUEC the document the authority requires is issued and controlled.
The speeding report is the evidence that monitoring actually happens.
With Remindo the client doesn't end up without insurance or inspection.
Licences and certificates with warning before they expire.
Exact words you can use on the visit. No jargon.
“When the inspection turns up, you won't be digging for paperwork: you'll pull a PDF in two minutes.”
“The driver checks the vehicle from a phone and the photo and signature are on record. That is what they will ask for.”
“And if your insurance is about to expire, the system warns you beforehand, not after the fine.”
You resell under your own brand. This is who it works for, and with what argument.
Where the contract and manifest are a requirement to operate at all.
Required to have a road safety plan depending on size.
Where the main client audits the contractor.
Whose customer demands compliance as a contract condition.
Yes: it provides the evidence those plans ask for — speed, driving hours, inspections and driver monitoring — and leaves it documented.
Yes, with checklists in the app: the driver fills them in with a photo and the time and place are recorded.
Yes, there is a module to generate and control that paperwork without redoing it by hand every time.
No. The applications are included: there is no per-module charge.
The client who complies out of obligation pays without arguing about price.