A security company lives on client trust. Their problem isn't knowing where the guard is: it is being able to prove it when the client complains.
With GuardCheck every point is logged with a code and a location.
What sustains the contract renewal.
A panic button to call for help without it showing.
Who clocked in, at what time and for how long.
Where the nearest unit is when something happens.
The guard reports from their phone on the spot.
Exact words you can use on the visit. No jargon.
“When the client says the guard didn't do the patrol, you send the report with the time and place of every point.”
“And the guard has a button to call for help without anyone noticing.”
You resell under your own brand. This is who it works for, and with what argument.
Patrols with codes, location and incident logs.
Live response vehicles.
For the guard with no vehicle.
The monthly evidence for the client.
With points marked by the guard, each with its time and its real location. It stops being the guard's word.
Yes, and it is what sustains the contract: the client sees every patrol completed without having to take anyone's word.
With a panic button and live location, which is what makes it possible to react if something happens.
For patrols on foot the phone is enough. For motorised patrols it is combined with vehicle tracking.
That is exactly the argument to open with.